Which of the following is NOT an advantage of the in vitro method of labeling red blood cells with 99mTc pertechnetate?

Study for the Nuclear Medicine Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question has hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

The in vitro method of labeling red blood cells with 99mTc pertechnetate does indeed offer several advantages, but the assertion that it has the lowest risk of red cell hemolysis is not accurate. In fact, one of the known disadvantages of in vitro labeling is that it can lead to greater risk of hemolysis compared to in vivo methods.

In vitro labeling allows for the washing of red blood cells to eliminate interfering substances, which is beneficial for reducing the background signal and enhancing imaging quality. This method is also associated with higher labeling efficiencies compared to in vivo methods, where the efficiency can be lower due to competition with endogenous compounds.

Another advantage is the availability of commercially manufactured kits that do not require cell separation. These kits simplify the process, making it more accessible for practitioners.

While in vitro labeling allows for greater control over the labeling process and quality of the labeled cells, the risk of hemolysis exists due to the handling and washing of red blood cells, which can lead to cell destruction if not performed carefully. Hence, the correct answer indicates that the claim about the risk of hemolysis is not an advantage of the in vitro approach.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy